‘Students are our purpose,’ Vice-Chancellor Paddy Nixon said during the Semester two Student Town Hall.

The event, run by the UC Student Representative Council (SRC), was an opportunity for students to ask questions directly to Vice-Chancellor Prof. Nixon and other prominent UC staff.

However, the majority of student-submitted questions were ignored.

Of the 25 questions submitted to the SRC via an anonymous portal, two were addressed solely as an online response by the SRC, eight were addressed at the Town Hall, and 15 were overlooked.

This Town Hall comes after UC transitioned to a combination of remote and in-person learning due to COVID-19 restrictions, student protests over the use of online proctoring during semester one exams, and announcements from universities Australia-wide of job reductions and financial stress.

Hosted by UC SRC President, Hamish Jackson, the panel included Vice-Chancellor Professor Paddy Nixon, Director of Health and Counselling Centre Dr Jenny Weekes, and the Acting Director of Student Connect, Mara Eversons.

UC Finances

Mr. Jackson questioned Vice-Chancellor Nixon on UC’s current financial position. UC is in a better position financially than other universities and ‘this year isn’t actually too bad,’ Nixon assured students. Although he noted that the shops and services at UC have suffered from fewer students and staff on campus.

Prof. Nixon also said that there would be lost revenue from a reduced number of international students. 

“Yes, I think we are going to have to make some challenging decisions, but we need to do those openly and collectively, and we’re not quite at the stage yet,” he said.

Proctorio and Semester two grading

No Proctorio poster reads 'No proctorio! UC students do not want to be spied on!'

Changes to grading systems and assessments were briefly discussed by Acting Director of Student Connect, Mara Eversons.

When questioned on the potential for future changes she confirmed that other measures may be considered but they will “have to see what happens.”

Continuing from Semester one Mrs Eversons said, “if your GPA drops you can have it amended.”

She said the university has also encouraged teaching staff to consider alternative modes of assessment to exams if possible.

While many students were displeased with the online proctoring systems implementation, Mrs Eversons reiterated that “all units with proctored exams should say so on unit outlines. Some units need to be proctored to prove academic integrity in the field and ensure the unit is properly accredited.”

The panel did not address security concerns raised by a student regarding information breaches from ProctorU. The University of Canberra uses the company Proctorio to conduct online proctored exams. However, security breaches of ProctorU reflect security concerns raised by students during semester one protests.

No Proctorio poster reads 'We say no Proctorio at UC! Canberra Law Students' Society, UC Diagnostic Imaging Association, UC Engineering Society, UC Environmental Science Society, UC Information technology Students Association, UC Labor, UC Liberal Society, UC Nursing Society, UC Student Undergraduate Developer Organisation (SUDO)'
Source: Canberra Law Students’ Society Facebook

Student mental health and wellbeing

Dr. Weekes spoke about the importance of connectedness and student wellbeing. She referred to the fact that medicine and counseling have been open throughout the pandemic, and encouraged students to keep their own wellbeing as a top priority.

Both Dr. Weekes and Vice-Chancellor Prof. Nixon stressed that medicine and counseling services were not at risk from the strains of the pandemic.

UC SRC

The failure of the SRC to ask questions submitted by students calls into question their ability to adequately represent the student body.

Unaddressed questions ranged from accessibility and disability support provided by UC, unit fees discrepancies for online verse in-person unit delivery, concerns regarding online proctored exams and recent information breaches from some proctoring companies, university car park fees, and Vice-Chancellor Nixon’s current salary as UC enters a time of financial instability.

The Semester one Town Hall, held in May, saw multiple students questioning the SRC directly. They called for a restructuring of the SRC and many comments state that the current SRC is not adequately representing the student body.

Anonymous student questions:
'Shouldn't the discussions between the UCSRC and the university administration be publicly available or at least have increased transparency considering the group represents the entire student body?'
Comment 'Cause we damn well weren't consulted with'
'Do you plan to revise the structure of the SRC, noting that in their current form they are not adequately advocating for the entire student body nor are they engaging with us in any respect prior to their decision making.'
'Why didn't we receive an email to vote on the SRC's latest new representative? We received a voting email late last year for member that I do not recognise in the new representative announcements.'
'Do you have a solution to the SRC not being representatives of the student body and lacking communication with the societies and students they're meant to be representing.'
Anonymous students questions submitted to the SRC Semester one Town hall.

One student stated, via the semester two Town Hall anonymous portal, that the SRC had previously been non-responsive to students online, and questioned the accessibility of the Town Hall.

Although information explaining how students can access the town hall was posted in a student bulletin, it was not provided in the Facebook event until the town hall was wrapping up.

A full list of anonymous questions and comments submitted to the SRC can be found here.

The UC SRC declined the opportunity to comment.

The semester two UC SRC Town Hall was recorded and can be viewed on UCLearn by joining the UC SRC canvas page.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *